The skepticism in Congress on deepening proposals that the government pay a large share of insurance costs of future terrorist attacks, a new proposal by a group of consumers to help insurers manage their losses in the long term loans from the Confederation.
After an early distribution, namely that the insurance sector, the loss of more than $ 40 billion in the World Trade Center, the attack requires assistance, the number of Congress wonder why insurers not, yes , For the costs of future attacks. They estimated at 300 billion dollars of capital. If help growing sense for insurers to pay for a quantity of losses since the beginning.
At a conference of insurance supervision authorities Monday and today, Congressional aid, it was to deepen the Congress feels that insurance companies have not done enough of their case. ”It is necessary, in a key route and strong,’’said an assistant.
Confrontation with the regulatory authorities, representatives of Richard Baker, a Republican from Louisiana, is the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Capital Markets, the insurance sector and the government, said the Congress was a lot of conviction, ‘ ‘we operate should be.”
The great debate”,” he said,”is finished, we take action.”
Many in the Congress of the opinion that they acted too quickly and too generous to provide $ 15 billion bailout package for airlines, said Congressional aid, and she thinks that this is an action they do not want repeat.
Robert Gordon, Senior Counsel of the House Financial Services Committee, said:”The members want a return on blocking and not a bailout. And many of the proposals we have seen, really a bailout.
A new proposal, which the consumer Federation of America goes to Congress Wednesday, would allow insurers manage their losses with long-term loans from the Confederation.
The plan would insurance companies to pay 5% of its initial capital for losses caused by terrorism, then the government appropriations to cover losses in the next corresponds to 5% of capital. For industry, which amount to over $ 30 billion.
Any further losses would be by loans from the Confederation, which are repaid over many years by the supplements business and private clients throughout the country.
”This way, the government would not interfere with the industry a handout,’’said J. Robert Hunter, director of insurance for Consumer Federation and the author of the plan. ”But that would define the insurers’ potential losses and gives them the certainty they need to cover the price.”
A congressional aide, has been closely the debate on the cover terrorist said he thought, Mr. Hunter’s proposal would be seriously considered.
”There is no plan on the table, human beings have merged,’’said Warrant. I believe”, Bob Hunter has a genuine contribution to make.”
Mr. Hunter is to explain its proposal Wednesday at a hearing of the Senate, the Banking Committee. He explained his idea this morning at the conference on the attacks, which was convened by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the organization of state insurance regulatory authorities.
Senator Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat and a former commissioner of public insurance, have responded positively to the plan, but said it is necessary to study and consider other proposals.
At the meeting of the Committee of the Senate, Wednesday, the Treasury Secretary, Paul H. O’Neill is expected to exceed the management of the proposal on the assurance of the economy, which requires that insurers and government share the first $ 20 billion in losses, with the Government to pay 80 per cent. If higher levels, the government would share increased 90 percent. The Committee intends to continue the hearings on Thursday.
Mr. Baker said regulatory authorities, it was uncertain that Congress would be able to work, full details of a package for insurers before interrupted. He said the legislature may adopt a solution to provide reports on Jan 1, if 70 percent of commercial insurance contracts and then renewed their work on the action early next year.